|
![]() NCI: Leo King Amtrak will continue operating as the carrier, USDOT and the Administration come to an agreement. |
| Amtrak, DOT ink pact |
|
Editor For a time Friday, it looked like the pact between Amtrak and the U.S. Department of Transportation was falling apart, but by 8:56 p.m., reporters had the story from Transportation Secretary Norman Y. Mineta and Amtrak's chairman, John Robert Smith, that they had come to an agreement. Mineta told reporters, "The Department of Transportation, and Amtrak, have reached agreement on the first phase of a two-phase financial assistance package. Our goal was to ensure uninterrupted service for the over 750,000 Americans who rely on Amtrak and our nation's commuter rail services every day - we have accomplished that goal." He said, "Both parties have agreed on a direct $100 million loan under the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) program, to be followed by a joint request from Amtrak and the Administration for the Congress to provide not more than an additional $170 million in operating funds for the remainder of this fiscal year." The Administration demanded 12 conditions, which Amtrak agreed to. Many involve greater financial accountability. The carrier must spend all its money over the next 15 months on existing assets and services, and not to plan to expand service. It also must identify $100 million in potential budget cuts by the end of August. Also, Amtrak must freeze all management salaries and suspend any annual bonuses for this year for employees with salaries greater than $75,000. Officials had said one sticking point was a proposed provision that would prevent Amtrak from entering into any new agreement that restricts its ability to contract with private firms. Amtrak also agreed to bring in consultants to thoroughly assess the value of its property. One of David Gunn's first actions upon taking over the railroad six weeks ago was to fire all its consultants. The Administration also wants Amtrak to move toward a system in which it uses outside companies to run its reservations, food service and equipment maintenance, and perhaps even some routes, but the route-cutting requirement was eventually deleted. Amtrak is carrying heavy debt, which was estimated to be $3.85 billion last March. It insists it needs at least $1.2 billion to run through September 2003, but the Bush administration is sticking by its initial "place holder" amount of $521 million. Mineta noted that Smith, who is also the mayor of Meridian Mississippi, "arrived in Washington Monday to help solve this crisis, and he has stayed with the effort all week long. Thank you John Robert." Mineta said "As I have said before, it is not the sole responsibility of this Administration to solve Amtrak's immediate or long term economic situation, so I call on the Congress to join the Administration in developing long-term, fundamental reform of our nation's intercity passenger rail system, consistent with the principles I outlined last week that will ensure consistent, reliable passenger service for all Americans." The secretary, who took over the job in January 2001, said the agreement "is an initial, very modest down-payment on implementing the Administration's first principle for passenger rail reform - placing Amtrak's operations on a sound financial footing." Mineta added that the conditions agreed to "reflect a new approach to running this railroad in a more open, business like fashion." He explained that "Under this agreement, Amtrak will provide clear, timely, financial information to the board of directors and DOT; Amtrak will complete a third-party study to identify a full range of possible management efficiencies and cost reduction options; Amtrak will provide a complete list and value of its current assets; Amtrak will provide a list of at least $100 million in operating reductions. In addition, Amtrak agrees to seek the cooperation of all of its employees in achieving the operating cost reductions needed to meet Amtrak's financial crisis." Many railroaders interpreted that remark as preparing for a pay cut. Mineta averred, "The Bush Administration is committed to a viable system of intercity passenger rail. However, this crisis proves clearly that without real reform, Amtrak will continue to lurch from crisis to crisis." Mineta also stated the debate over the future of reform will not be easy. "Now I'm not under any illusions, but one thing remains for sure, this crisis, temporarily resolved, will inevitably be repeated again and again, until we develop a lasting solution," and he added, "This is no time to stand on the sidelines offering unrealistic solutions and criticism to those who are engaged in trying to resolve this issue. I urge all parties, including the Congress, Amtrak, labor leaders, state officials and, of course, the traveling public, to join the Administration in a national debate for lasting and meaningful reform of our intercity passenger rail system. Americans deserve nothing less." That outcome was a far cry when earlier on Friday it appeared the deal between the Amtrak board of directors, USDOT and the White House was unraveling. Informed sources told D:F earlier on Friday that the Office of Manpower and Budget, an arm of the White House, "is doing all it can to derail Amtrak." OMB's director, Mitchell Daniels, has made no secret that he has no use for Amtrak. Last week he said it is "not out of the question" to include Amtrak in the homeland security bill, and added the Administration was determined to keep Amtrak open, but he had harsh words for Amtrak's board of directors on June 25 after meeting with Vice President Cheney and Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss.) "We're determined to keep Amtrak and also to see the beginnings of change at Amtrak," he said. "If this board was serving in a private sector capacity it probably would have been forced to resign, if not faced some severe sanctions." Things are still not hunky-dory at Amtrak, but they are better than they were on Friday. Neither OMB nor any of the other principals, including the carrier's new president and CEO, David Gunn, would discuss publicly what the specific issues were that were holding up the agreement. Citing unnamed sources, the Washington Post said the White House had demanded that Amtrak not enter labor agreements that would prevent work now done by union workers to be contracted out, and that it set a cost-cutting goal for next year. The tentative plan would require Amtrak to improve its fiscal discipline and performance, and adjust accounting procedures. It also would make the railroad provide the government with a better understanding of its assets and liabilities as well as cost controls and revenue options. Meanwhile, Laura Kliewer, of the Midwest Interstate Passenger Rail Commission, said on Friday, "It looks like the Senate could be ready to vote on S.1991, Senator Ernest "Fritz" Holling's (D-S.C.) bill that would reauthorize Amtrak for five years and provide real money to the development of high-speed rail corridors," but the solons went home before taking a vote. They will be in their home districts on their Independence Day holiday for one week. She said that would also "be along with establishing a national passenger rail system, providing money for Amtrak, requiring greater accountability and improving security." Supporters were trying to get enough support for a cloture vote (which would limit debate, shut down filibusters and force a vote to be taken. The House, she said, probably would not agree to S. 1991's provisions, "but having the bill pass the Senate should go a long way in pressuring the House to move on its Amtrak (HR 4545) and perhaps even high-speed rail bonding (HR 2950) legislation." The day before, Amtrak president and CEO David Gunn sent another letter to the field, in which he stated a wage freeze is intended for upper-level management. He also told employees, "We reached a tentative agreement [Wednesday] night with the USDOT to resolve our short-term financial problem. The details need to be worked out, but if we're successful, and I hope we are, there will be no shutdown of service this summer." That, however, was before OMB began what were apparently new demands, and before the pact was agreed to. Gunn told the railroaders, "The DOT will give us an immediate loan of about $100 million. For the balance of what we need, the Bush Administration and Amtrak will seek Congressional action." Gunn noted a number of conditions to the plan "need to be worked out, but many are things you know I've already stated, like better financial accountability and transparency, and monthly fiscal reporting to Congress and the DOT. While you may have heard there will be a wage freeze, it will only apply to senior management." He hoped to finish the agreement by week's end "so I can go back to doing what I enjoy best - running the railroad - and you don't have to keep reading these letters from me every day." He also thanked them for staying focused on their jobs, making safe operations a top priority, and promised to send them copies of the agreement "when it is done."
Return to index |
![]() NCI: Leo King The Downeaster makes a new stop in Woburn, Mass., starting today. |
| New Downeaster Station opens today |
|
Amtrak Vice Chair Mike Dukakis and other dignitaries take part this morning in ceremonies beginning at 11:45 inaugurating the new Anderson Regional Transportation Center at Woburn, Mass. It is adjacent to Route 128.
The National Corridors Initiative's president, Jim RePass, hailed the opening of the Anderson Regional Transportation Center (RTC), the first new station stop to be added for Amtrak's wildly successful Downeaster train, and an important step in the beginning of the North-South Rail Link project that will join North and South Stations by rail. The new station's Amtrak Downeaster, and MBTA Lowell Line Commuter Rail trains, which will also stop at the Anderson RTC, go to North Station. They will immediately provide greater access to intercity rail at South Station or Back Bay Station: a quick cab ride to South Station or an Orange Line trip from nearby Haymarket Station to Back Bay Station, both connect to Amtrak's new high-speed Acela Express service to New York and beyond. The North South Rail Link, which proponents see as the next major infrastructure project for Boston and the region, has been in the works for more than a decade. A long-awaited environmental impact study, delayed from 2001 when a Wall Street Journal story disclosed that a doctored, politically-ordered negative report on the Rail Link's economics had been ordered by elements of the former Mass EOTC management, is expected to show that contrary to the numbers in the political report, the project could cost less, and have much greater cost recovery potential than other large infrastructure projects, which will help it in the Federal approvals process. The Rail Link would connect the entire MBTA rail system through Boston to permit suburb-to-suburb commuting, thereby increasing the employee pool for Massachusetts corporations. It would also provide the infrastructure for a Montreal-like "Boston Underneath", extensive enough to provide dry, winter-proof access to much of downtown Boston, the North End, and the Waterfront. Montreal despite its cold climate has made itself a winter destination through its extensive underground shopping, hotel, entertainment and residential complexes, and the National Corridor Initiative Northeast division has suggested that Boston consider doing the same as a part of the Rail Link project, in order to maximize the return on investment. The Downeaster, the brainchild of NCI Board Member and TrainRiders Northeast Chairman Wayne Davis who fought for 12-years to re-establish Boston-Portland service, runs between Portland (ME) and Boston four times a day. Its ridership is already above projections opponents once labeled "unrealistic". Ridership now looks like it will far surpass even the most optimistic numbers from just a few months ago. It is already a major contributor to the easing of short-hop (New York) congestion at Logan airport, and will be even more valuable when the Rail Link is built by giving faster access to South Station-based Acela high speed rail.
Return to index |
|
Furlong named Destination: Freedom publisher |
|
|
Jim Furlong, currently director of media outreach for the National Corridors Initiative, has been named publisher of Destination: Freedom, NCI's weekly electronic newsletter, said Jim RePass, president and chief executive officer of NCI, who remains in that role. The change was effective June 24.
RePass said Furlong's task will be to raise the public profile and circulation of the highly respected publication, which provides expert reporting on and analysis of events and trends in intercity and commuter rail, and public transportation, throughout the U.S. The online publication is edited by Leo King, who possesses a rare combination of journalistic skills and in-depth, hands-on knowledge of railroad operations, RePass said. Furlong is a former Dow Jones Newswires editor and executive. He is author of a book on German industrial relations, four published short stories that use business as a background, and thousands of financial and general-interest news articles.
Return to index |
![]()
Jim Furlong |
| Two bags and no more, says Amtrak |
|
A two-bag carry-on restriction is becoming the rule on Amtrak, starting today. Up until yesterday, it was not an absolute limit.
The carrier said they were making the move "To ensure that carry-on baggage does not pose a safety hazard for passengers." The passenger railroad also stated, "As a security precaution, baggage identification tags will be required on most carry-on items. The new baggage limit and ID tag requirement will not apply to purses, laptop carriers, briefcases, or infant accessories." Travel agents were told there were no changes to the checked baggage policy, which "continues to require passenger identification, a policy established last fall." The carrier explained, "This new policy regarding carry-on baggage ensures that luggage does not pose a safety hazard on board our trains by blocking aisles and vestibules. In addition, the required luggage tags will prevent confusion in identifying bags that look similar and will help in associating bags with their owners," said Stan Bagley, Amtrak's Chief Operating Officer. He said ticket agents and on-board train crews "will supply passengers with pre-printed ID tags, but passengers' own tags, including a name and address, are acceptable under the new guidelines." Agents were warned each piece of carry-on luggage is not to exceed the specified dimensions of a medium-sized Pullman suitcase (28 inches by 22 inches by 17 inches." If space allows, a passenger may be permitted one carry-on bag that is larger than the acceptable per unit dimensions, but the bag "may not exceed the dimensions of two Pullman suitcases of the allowable size. Weight is also factor - "No carry-on luggage of any type be permitted on board that obviously exceeds 50 pounds." Amtrak said carry-on limits will not apply to briefcases, purses, laptops, or cosmetics cases, nor infant accessories, such as car seats, diaper bags, and strollers. "Passengers are requested to stow such items under seats" when they can, "leaving the overhead luggage racks for larger items. Ski equipment, snowboards, golf clubs and bicycles will only be handled as checked baggage on Amtrak trains, unless the train is equipped to carry such items elsewhere.
Return to index |
|
Tacoma Link Here's what the Tacoma Link cars will look like. |
|
Tacoma's streetcar line takes shape
Tacoma, Wash., is getting a light rail layout for commuters, and track on a 1.6-mile course is being laid for an opening late next year. The double-track layout, named Tacoma Link, passes along South 25th Street, Pacific, past Freight House Square, a carbarn, and Tacoma Dome, among others. |
![]() Two photos: WashARP/Zack Willhoite |
|
On May 15 at 19th Street and Pacific Avenue, construction workers have dug the trench for the rails and have strung them out in preparation for final installation.
Jim Hamre, Washington Rail News editor, said, "Construction began last summer, and the line is scheduled to open in fall 2003. Cars will arrive this September." The Washington Assn of Railroad Passengers publishes the monthly newsletter. Hamre said the city is paying the entire cost of the project - there are no TEA-21 funds involved. "All local funding is from the Pierce County sub-area of the Sound Transit district," and is costing around $60 million. He said the equipment is from Skoda and the Czech Republic, and they are "virtually identical to the new Portland [Ore.] streetcars." The 60-foot, 62,000-pound cars will have 30 seats and room for 26 standing passengers on their low floors. The tracks are standard gauge with 126 pound-rails laid under 660-volt catenary. Carbarn tracks are being connected to the rest of the system now at South 25th and McKinley. There will be a LINK station at Tacoma Dome station, a 2,400-stall park-and-ride lot with Greyhound, ST Express and Pierce Transit bus service. There is also a Temporary Sounder station across the street from the light rail station, but a permanent Sounder Station will be near Freight House Square. Sound Transit, which is in charge of the work, states on its web site "All rides will be free." The trains will operate on a ten-minute headway, two minutes between station stops, and it will take eight minutes to run from end-to-end. Tacoma Link is online at http://www.soundtransit.org/linkrail/tacoma Washington ARP is online at http://www.trainweb.com/washarp |
![]() Looking East along South 25th with the completed track installation on March 1 and looking toward Pacific Avenue. After paving, the track was six inches above the tops to allow emergency vehicles to "mount" it and keep automobile traffic off of the tracks. The same textures and colors of the track pavement will be the same on Pacific Avenue with the molded concrete brickwork.
Return to index |
| Richardson gets light rail today |
|
It took six years to get there, but the commuter trains are finally making the journey between Dallas and Richardson as the Dallas Area Rapid Transit service begins its latest expansion today.
Trains will make stops at the first light-rail stations outside Dallas, and the 9.3-mile rail link also takes trains to the doorstep of Collin County, one of the nation's fastest-growing areas, reports the Dallas Morning News. U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Tex.), a strong advocate for public transportation who helped DART secure federal funding, attended Saturday's festivities to kick off the opening of the seven new light-rail stations. She said the expansion will help reduce the number of cars on the roads and curb pollution throughout the region. "Any metropolitan area in the United States of America that says to me, 'We think we can do rail”' I say, 'Go see DART,'", the senator said. "Ours is the absolute best new system in America." DART officials expect the rail line extension, built in two segments in less than four years, to come in about 10 percent under its $205.5 million budget. "As we continue to expand, our shadow influences more of the community," said Gary Thomas, DART president and executive director. "It's an exciting time for the region." Collin County's population has doubled since 1990 to almost 550,000, according to the North Central Texas Council of Governments. That growth, which has occurred almost exclusively in the county's southern half, gives DART a pool of customers who can drive to several commuter-based stations, each with more than 1,000 parking spaces. Richardson and DART have met with major employers to explore the best ways for their employees and customers to avoid traffic and parking problems. "When you look at traveling on the freeways, you could have an incident that will delay you a half-hour," said Walter Ragsdale, Richardson's director of transportation. "You can set your watch to these trains."
Return to index |
| 'Susie-Q' ponders passenger train |
|
New York will spend $9.7 million to start passenger rail service between Binghamton and Syracuse, state officials said June 26. The once-daily trains will still take longer and cost more than driving or taking a bus, reporter for the Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin noted, and railroad officials who will run the new system say they haven't looked at it closely enough to know just how many people will use it.
Daily service is expected by spring 2003, but "excursion service" could begin this year. When the plan is finished, it would link Binghamton to shopping and sporting events in Syracuse. It also would bring riders to the entrance of the Amtrak station in northern Syracuse, meaning passengers could catch connecting trains to other parts of the country. Officials expect one-way tickets for daily passenger trains to cost about $25 when service starts in 2003. Trains to hockey games and events at the Carrier Dome could start this year. "Is this going to be perfect? No," said state Sen. Thomas W. Libous (R-Binghamton), "but it's going to be a whole lot better than what we have now." Passenger trains haven't run to Binghamton since 1970. The trains would be operating over the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad, a small regional railroad that has operated passenger trains around Syracuse for a number of years. Daniel Chazin of Teaneck, N.J., a close watcher of the U.S. railroad scene, observed, "They have a positive attitude toward passenger service, and are concerned only that the costs of such service be subsidized by the government, so that the railroad will not lose money on providing the service. In the case of the passenger service around Syracuse, the subsidy is being provided primarily via a tax abatement." State officials began seriously considering a Binghamton-to-Syracuse passenger rail link after a report prepared for the state DOT found that creating service to Scranton and New York City would be a slow and expensive process. Setting up that connection would take at least five years. Instead, New York will take the $5 million it set aside to put Binghamton-area residents on trains to New York and spend it putting them on trains to Syracuse. The state DOT has earmarked another $1.3 million for the project and the state Senate will add $3.3 million from a transportation fund carved out in the state budget, Libous said. Most of the money will be spent fixing the track connecting the two cities. In some places, it's so out of shape that federal regulators say trains can't go more than 10 mph. The upgrades also are meant to speed freight trains traveling between the cities. But even after the tracks are fixed, service still won't be as fast as a bus or a car. NYS&W Railway Corp., nicknamed "Susie-Q," estimates a Binghamton-Syracuse trip will take about two hours. Along most of the roughly 75-mile route, the trains won't be able to go much faster than 45 mph. By car, the trip takes about an hour and a quarter. The carrier is considering using elderly Budd cars from the 1950s era. Greyhound buses travel the route in an hour and a half, for $27 round trip. "As it is, this can't compete with somebody driving," NYS&W Vice President Nathan Fenno said. "The speed on the highway's 65, but we think there's a convenience factor. There's the ability to relax or read instead of getting into road rage on the highway." The trains would connect Binghamton with the Syracuse University campus, nightlife at Armory Square, the Carousel Center mall and eventually the Amtrak station. Libous said the company plans to run trains consisting of two 90-passenger self-propelled cars between the two cities. The cars are retired and rehabilitated New York City transit cars. The trains would stop in Cortland and possibly other villages along the route, which would run through Chenango Forks, Whitney Point, Marathon, Homer and Tully. Fenno said NYS&W hasn't studied how many people might ride the trains. "We've come to the conclusion that we're going to get the operation running and test the market that way," he said. The schedule could change depending on how many people take the trains, he said. NYS&W hasn't yet set a schedule for the daily trains, but officials said they're likely to leave in the morning and return in the evening. Part of the state's money will be used to build a small train station in Binghamton, near Bevier Street, Libous said. In addition to regular passenger service, the company is considering running excursion trips that would take people from the Southern Tier to Syracuse when the Binghamton Senators play the Syracuse Crunch or for events at the Carrier Dome. The dome plays host to concerts, and Syracuse University football and basketball games. The state Assembly is considering using $3.3 million of its transportation money to create similar excursion service between Binghamton and Utica, Libous said. That line would connect with the Adirondack Scenic Railroad in Utica. "Someday there's the potential that you could get on a train in Binghamton and ride all the way up to Lake Placid," Fenno said, "but that would be a very long trip."
Return to index |
| MBTA opens two new stations |
|
MBTA celebrated opening two new commuter rail stations in Southboro and Westboro, Mass., last week.
"These stations and the additional parking is going a long way to making commuter rail service more convenient and more accessible to more people," MBTA General Manager Michael Mulhern said. The Southboro and Westboro stations bring with them 600 more parking spots MBTA officials say are sorely needed on the Framingham-to-Worcester commuter rail extension. A third new station in Ashland with another 600-plus parking spaces is scheduled for August. The three new stations bring to a close a $14.2 million expansion of commuter rail service connecting Route 9 communities to Boston. The MBTA owns the trains and tracks that carry commuters to and from Boston and its suburbs, but pays Amtrak $200 million annually for the 1,500 employees who service and dispatch the trains and maintain the tracks. "It's a good contract and this is a healthy, fully funded system," Mulhern said. The contract expires July 2003 and the MBTA will include "very strong" language in the next contract to guard against the possibility of Amtrak's problems shutting down MBTA trains, he said. Transportation officials are searching for ways to increase service for Worcester-area residents and businesses, including running trains for reverse-commuters and increasing mid-day service, said Mulhern.
Return to index |
|
BNSF, BLE ink safety pact |
|
The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) and The Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. (BNSF) announced an agreement on June 24 that launches a new era in railroad employee safety programs.
Through the agreement, which has been ratified by BLE members, a new safety culture will be introduced that focuses on the active participation of employees and BLE and BNSF leadership working as a team to create a safer workplace, according to both organizations in a joint press release. The agreement also establishes an approach to discipline that further stresses training and counseling instead of punitive discipline. "The BLE is happy to be a full partner with BNSF when it comes to safety," BLE International Vice-President Stephen Speagle said. "Accidents cost BNSF millions of dollars each year, but they cost our members their lives. The joint agreement - ratified by BLE members and negotiated by the four BLE general chairmen, with the assistance of the International Division of the BLE - will allow our members to fully participate in creating a safer working environment." The agreement provides for BLE-represented safety people to assure that the agreement's procedures are being implemented and interpreted uniformly across BNSF's 33,000-route-mile system. Safety forums at different BNSF locations will address conditions that have to be corrected to improve safe production, replacing the previous reporting, cataloguing and investigative process. Workplace coaching, counseling and retraining will replace the existing discipline process for non-repetitive and non-serious rules violations. "This agreement, the first of its kind between the BLE and a large railroad, represents a fundamental change in our approach to safety for operating employees," said M. David Dealy, BNSF's vice president, Transportation. "Both BLE and BNSF will focus on root cause analysis and corrective action to prevent injuries caused by behavior as well as injuries caused by environmental conditions." Speagle said, "The BLE believes that the new approach to discipline, which places a higher emphasis on training and counseling, will also contribute to a better and safer work place. He noted, "The overwhelming ratification of the agreement by the BLE membership is further evidence of the need for change. We are hoping the appointment of BLE Safety Coordinators and the implementation of the new agreement will provide for the change that everyone agrees is necessary. "We are proud to work with BNSF to make the work place safer for not just our members, but for everybody working at BNSF."
Return to index |
| Arbitrator rules against P&W |
|
Amtrak won its case June 27 against the Providence & Worcester Railroad Co. An arbitrator agreed with Amtrak for raising its rates and charging maintenance costs for rail sidings for tracks the freight carrier operas on, primarily Rhode Island and Connecticut.
The arbitrator, who was unnamed in a P&W press release, said the amount P&W owes Amtrak $723,890.94, and covers the time between July 9, 1999 through March 31, 2001. P&W estimated the total amount owed is $1,250,000. "The estimated impact of the award will be to reduce the company's pre-tax earnings for the second quarter of 2002 by approximately $1,250,000, although the actual amount is subject to calculation," the press release stated, and "the total impact of the award will result in a loss for the second quarter. P&W said it disagrees with the arbitrator's findings, and "expects to contest the ruling."
Return to index |
| FEC to sell former yard |
|
Florida East Coast Ry. Reported June 26 it has entered into contracts to sell two parcels of land in downtown Miami.
One is the former Buena Vista rail yard of about 56-acres, and is a vacant parcel near downtown Miami. The contracted sale price is $34.5 million. The other parcel, is seven located between the Miami River and S.W. 3rd Street in downtown Miami. The site has approximately 345 feet of frontage on the Miami River and is located near the Government Center district. The contracted sale price is $16.3 million, before sale commissions. Both closings are expected later this year.
Return to index |
|
VIA Rail operates new passenger cars |
|
VIA Rail Canada began operating its new Renaissance passenger cars on the overnight train between Montreal and Toronto on June 23.
The new equipment is part of the federal government's five-year, $402 million investment in passenger rail, intended to modernize the rail service and bring more trains, faster trains and more frequent services to Canadian travelers, the Canadian carrier stated in a press release last week VIA bought 139 new cars, and by the time they are all in service at the end of 2003, they will expand VIA's national passenger rail fleet by one-third. The new equipment is first being introduced on the Enterprise trains, which depart from Montreal and Toronto at 11:30 p.m. The westbound train arrives in Toronto at 8:20 a.m., and the eastbound train arrives in Montreal at 8:00 a.m. With state-of-the-art technology for passenger safety and comfort, the cars are specially designed to enhance overnight and business-class service. The equipment includes modern coaches; comfortable sleeping cars with private bedrooms and en-suite toilets, some with en-suite showers; and service cars, which include a travelers' lounge area. VIA intends to add new services in the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor this fall, and to enhance business and overnight services between Montreal and Halifax/Gaspe next year. As the new equipment is phased into service, VIA will be able to deploy equipment more efficiently across the entire passenger rail network. This will be especially beneficial in Western Canada where the lack of equipment has limited VIA's ability to fully meet the growing demand in recent years. VIA Rail Canada operates Canada's national passenger rail network, with more than 480 trains weekly on 14,000 kilometers of track, connecting more than 450 Canadian communities from coast-to-coast. VIA reported its trains carried almost four million passengers in 2001.
Return to index |
|
Railtrack deal remains on hold |
|
Legal wrangles were threatening to delay the long-awaited 500 million-pound deal to turn Railtrack into a not-for-profit operation until the end of the week.
On-going discussions over the terms of one part of the intricately structured deal, involving the Channel Tunnel train link, were the main reason for the continued failure of Railtrack shares to be listed again on the London Stock Exchange. It is understood, The Guardian reported, that the legal teams representing Railtrack in the sale of the first phase of the tunnel train link to London and Continent are frantically trying to remove the performance guarantees that were contained in their early agreements over Britain's train link to the continent. Unless such performance-related guarantees can be completely eradicated, the promise of early payments to frustrated Railtrack shareholders cannot be fulfilled.
Return to index |
|
Onward and Upward |
|
President & CEO, NCI The deal to save Amtrak through October 1 has been struck, as reported elsewhere, but make no mistake about it: now the work truly starts to make sure that this country has a balanced transportation system and that a strong and growing national rail network is a part of that. But first, hats off to Amtrak CEO Dave Gunn and Chairman John Robert Smith for winning this round while sticking to their principles. Playing to the looney libertarian gallery, some members of the Administration tried to get Dave Gunn to name specific routes he would cut, in return for the funds to stay in business. No deal, said Gunn: that is YOUR job, and Congress'. If you want a certain route, say so. If you don't, don't - but plan to pay for the privilege. He is right. For too many decades Washington has micro-managed Amtrak's route structure while providing a fraction of the money needed to build and operate a rail system. There is no doubt that some routes were instigated, kept in place, because key congressmen wanted them. So be it. That's representative democracy, but here's a note to Congress: if you want a route, vote to pay for it. Passenger trains, just like highways and airlines, do not make money, so let's not have any more fantasies about Amtrak showing a profit. But if given sufficient capital, it can recapture costs of many operations, and defray the over-all per-passenger cost to the public treasury. Over the next two-and-one-half months, the debate will rage in D.C. For those of you with an interest, especially journalists, public policy wonks tackling this subject, or elected officials, here are a few facts that might help: Q: Why subsidize a national rail system? We don't subsidize a national airline. A: That's right, we subsidize more than a dozen national airlines, not to mention a score of regional airlines, plus the private ("general") aviation business. Highways and airlines do not pay their own way, and never have. Q. But isn't competition good? A. Sure, and as soon as the basic infrastructure is in place, we can perhaps have it. Until then, talk about "privatization" of Amtrak is meaningless. The British Thatcher government privatized BritRail 10 years ago for ideological reasons after many years of underfunding that particular national rail system, and got utter chaos - and the demand from those "private" operators for more and more new subsidies, once they realized how bad the infrastructure was. In any event, despite the New York Times continuing uncorrected error on this subject, Amtrak does not have a monopoly on intercity train service. That was abolished in 1997. It has the guaranteed right to operate, which is important, but other operators can and do negotiate their own deals with the freight railroads. These tend to be high-end luxury trips costing many times Amtrak's ticket charge, but there is a market for that. So be it. Q. 99 percent of travel is by air and auto. Why start supporting rail, which carries so few people? A. Amtrak carries 22 million people a year. The commuter rail lines, many of which are state agencies that contract out to Amtrak, carry more than 400 million. But the 99 percent statistic is even more misleading than that, because it includes every trip taken in the auto, like going out for a loaf of bread, or shuttling the kids to soccer practice, etc., many of which would never be a candidate for an intercity train trip. The vehicle miles traveled add up, and distort the argument - which is exactly what Amtrak's enemies want, since they figure journalists, busy and distracted as they often are, will not catch the con job being worked on them by the rigid anti-Amtrak kooks. Q. Couldn't someone else run the national rail system? A. Sure, we could tear down what we've got and start over, and spend all that tax money - the money the critics keep talking about - again; but does that make sense? Only if you want to punish Amtrak for its poverty. Q. Wait a minute. Didn't Amtrak get $24.9 billion? A. Yes, it did, over the past 32 years. Over the same period the highways got $750 billion. Guess which mode people find easier to use? But of course, that leads to sprawl. An example: in the greater Chicago area between 1980 and 1990 population increased by 5 percent, but land use increased by 50 percent. Guess who gets to pay for all those new sewerage lines, firehouses, schools, road maintenance departments, etc? That's right, the taxpayer. Public transportation, and commuter and intercity rail, often using existing rights of way, could have easily served that population growth in Chicago (and other places with similar sprawl growth patterns, such as Phoenix or Atlanta and elsewhere) but we chose to pave it, and then suburbanize it. Talk about subsidies! With this issue I relinquish the publisher's role and title to Jim Furlong (see adjacent story), former editor and senior executive of Dow Jones, so that I can concentrate on running NCI. Leo King will continue his superb work as editor, and Wes Vernon as Washington Correspondent. And these commentaries will continue, at least as long as you can stand them. Many thanks for your support, and keep fighting! Jim RePass
Return to index |
|
NCI: Leo King collection Frisco. Fifty years ago, everyone knew what "Frisco" was - the St. Louis - San Francisco Railway. Like so many railroads of the period, they ran lots of EMD Fs and Es, like this F (for freight) unit. We can't tell from this nose view if it was an FT, F-7 or F-9, but it certainly is nostalgic. |
We try to be accurate in the stories we write, but even seasoned pros err occasionally. If you read something you know to be amiss, or if you have a question about a topic, we'd like to hear from you. Please e-mail the crew at leoking@nationalcorridors.org. Please include your name, and the community and state from which you write. Destination: Freedom is partially funded by the Surdna Foundation, and other contributors. Journalists and others who wish to receive high quality NCI-originated images that appear in Destination: Freedom may do so at a nominal fee of $10.00 per image. "True color" .jpg images average 1.7MB each, and are 300 dots-per-inch for print publishers. In an effort to expand the on-line experience at the National Corridors Initiative web site, we have added a page featuring links to other rail travel sites. We hope to provide links to those cities or states that are working on rail transportation initiatives - state DOTs, legislators, governor's offices, and transportation professionals - as well as some links for travelers, enthusiasts, and hobbyists. If you have a favorite rail link, please send the uniform resource locator address (URL) to the webmaster in care of this web site. An e-mail link appears at the bottom of the NCI web site pages to get in touch with D. M. Kirkpatrick, NCI's webmaster in Boston. |